Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

U.S. appeals court rejects most of Florida social media law

Published 05/23/2022, 01:50 PM
Updated 05/23/2022, 06:43 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Facebook, Google and Twitter logos are seen in this combination photo from Reuters files. REUTERS

By Brendan Pierson

(Reuters) -Most of a Florida law that sought to stop social media companies from restricting users' political speech violates the companies' free speech rights and cannot be enforced, a federal appeals court ruled on Monday, agreeing with a lower court.

However, a three-judge panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals revived a part of the law requiring companies like Meta Platforms' Facebook (NASDAQ:FB), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) Inc's Google and Twitter Inc (NYSE:TWTR) to disclose the standards they use to moderate content on their platforms.

The unanimous decision was authored by Circuit Judge Kevin Newsom, who was appointed by Republican former President Donald Trump.

The 11th Circuit ruled that the parts of the law concerning political speech violated social media companies' First Amendment right to decide what to publish. However, it said requiring them to disclose their standards likely did not, ordering the lower court to reconsider that issue.

Bryan Griffin, a spokesperson for Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, called the decision "stupefying" and said the governor's office was considering appeal. DeSantis signed the law in May 2021.

NetChoice, an industry group including Facebook, Google and Twitter that had sued to challenge the law, noted the U.S. Constitution's protections when asked for comment.

"The First Amendment protects platforms and their right to moderate content as they see fit - and the government can't force them to host content they don't want," NetChoice Vice President Carl Szabo said in a statement.

DeSantis, a Republican, previously said the law was needed to prevent "censorship" by "Big Tech," pointing to Trump's removal by Twitter and Facebook in January 2021. The companies cited Trump's praise for his supporters who stormed the U.S. Capitol after he lost the 2020 presidential election as a reason for the bans.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The Florida law would fine social media companies that ban political candidates. A federal judge last June blocked the law from taking effect.

Another federal appeals court earlier this month upheld a Texas law prohibiting social media companies from banning users for their political views. NetChoice is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block that law.

Latest comments

Admittedly not an expert on the subject I find it odd that the right of a corporation to censor things it disagrees which is considered a right to free speech. It doesn't get more Orwellian than that. One obvious corollary of the court's decision is that the corporations should be legally responsible for anything they publish. But of course this will not happen.
"disagrees with", not "disagrees which"
john hill according to past supreme court rulings corporations have the right to free speech . your argument makes no sense.
GOP authoritarians lose another one. There was a time when the GOP believed in free enterprise (and morality, and the law, and honesty...). Their obsession with the perceived culture wars is making them ineffective and kooky.
The courts are acting as if a publisher or platform is an entity that can make a decision without human input. it is human input that is determined to be speech. not a corporate entity such as a publisher or platform which has no ability to determine the intent of speech without human input.
So are they publishers or platforms? They can't be both and only be held to standards that benefit them.
yes they can legally hold an opinion that is predicted to benefit them just look at Fox news ....
 technically they should now be know as Fox Views because most of what they do is neither unbias or true
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.