Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Porsche prevails at U.S. appeals court over VW squeeze

Published 08/15/2014, 03:12 PM
Updated 08/15/2014, 03:12 PM
Porsche prevails at U.S. appeals court over VW squeeze

Porsche prevails at U.S. appeals court over VW squeeze

By Jonathan Stempel NEW YORK (Reuters) - Porsche Automobil Holding SE (DE:PSHG_p) persuaded a U.S. federal appeals court to uphold the dismissal of a lawsuit by more than 30 hedge funds that claimed to suffer big losses because the German automaker fraudulently cornered the market in Volkswagen AG (DE:VOWG_p) shares.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday said Porsche's alleged wrongdoing was "so predominantly foreign" that it could not be held liable in U.S. federal courts under domestic securities fraud laws.

It also said that the hedge funds might still "conceivably" show that U.S. laws should apply, and try to amend their lawsuit in Manhattan federal court.

The unsigned 48-page decision was issued 2-1/2 years after oral arguments.

It is the latest of several 2nd Circuit decisions to make it harder to pursue U.S. lawsuits over foreign conduct, since a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd limited the reach of U.S. securities laws.

In various litigation, including some pending in Europe, hedge funds including Paul Singer's Elliott International LP and David Einhorn's Greenlight Capital LP sought to recoup about $2 billion of losses they blamed on Porsche's "massive short squeeze" in VW.

They claimed that during 2008, Porsche quietly bought most freely traded VW shares, despite publicly stating it had no plans to take a 75 percent controlling stake.

When Porsche revealed such a stake in October 2008, shares of VW skyrocketed. This briefly made VW the world's largest company by market value, but caused losses for the hedge funds on swap agreements where they bet the share price would drop.

In December 2010, U.S. District Judge Harold Baer, who has since died, dismissed the hedge funds' federal lawsuit.Upholding this ruling but on different grounds, the appeals court said the mere entering of swap agreements in the United States was by itself not enough to justify invoking Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, a widely used fraud law.

It said this was because the "foreignness" of the overall dispute might be so dominant that U.S. courts should stay out, or else risk putting U.S. and other countries' laws in conflict.

James Heaton, a partner at Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott representing the hedge funds, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A similar lawsuit in New York state court was previously dismissed.

"We're pleased with today's decision, which we think should finally end the U.S. litigation against Porsche," said Robert Giuffra, a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell representing Porsche. "Based on the court's reasoning, we don't see how the hedge funds can bring a valid U.S. securities fraud claim."

© Reuters. A man does the final touches on the Porsche logo of a Macan at the new plant in the eastern German city of Leipzig

The case is Parkcentral Global Hub Ltd et al v. Porsche Automobile Holding SE et al, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 11-403.

(Editing by G Crosse and Matthew Lewis)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.