Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

New York seeks $872 million from UPS in cigarette shipments trial

Published 09/19/2016, 03:25 PM
Updated 09/19/2016, 03:25 PM
© Reuters. United Parcel Service air craft are being loaded with air containers full of packages bound for their final destination at the UPS Worldport All Points International Hub during the peak delivery month in Louisville

By Nate Raymond

NEW YORK (Reuters) - New York state and city authorities took United Parcel Service Inc (N:UPS) to trial on Monday, urging a federal judge to make the company pay more than $872 million for making illegal deliveries of more than 683,000 cartons of untaxed cigarettes.

The non-jury trial before a federal judge in Manhattan came in a lawsuit by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and New York City as part of the state's ongoing efforts to combat smuggling of cigarettes from lower-tax areas.

Lilia Toson, a lawyer for the city, told U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in her opening statement that UPS repeatedly ignored red flags that many of its shipments from American Indian reservations contained untaxed cartons of cigarettes.

"The evidence will show a sufficiently large number of contraband shipments to suggest that UPS is turning a blind eye," Toson said.

She urged the judge to appoint a monitor to ensure UPS's compliance with the law, and argued the world's largest package delivery company should be forced to pay over $872 million in penalties and damages.

The size of the potential penalties appeared to catch UPS's lawyers off-guard. Carrie Cohen, an attorney for UPS, complained the state had given it no notice that was the potential figure, having only previously said damages could be $180 million.

Cohen urged Forrest to reject the state and city's "misleading" allegations, as the evidence would should it complied with the law and that authorities had mistaken cartons of legally shippable "little cigars" as cigarettes.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"The plaintiffs' case is devoid of evidence that UPS knew it was delivering cigarettes," she said.

Filed in February 2015, the lawsuit contends that since 2010, UPS illegally shipped over 683,000 cartons of untaxed cigarettes mostly from smoke shops situated on Indian reservations throughout New York state.

The deliveries to residences, unlicensed wholesalers and unlicensed retailers were made despite a 2005 agreement between UPS and New York in which the company agreed to stop cigarette shipments to consumers and unlicensed dealers, the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit followed a similar case the state and city against FedEx Corp (N:FDX), accusing it of similarly illegally delivering contraband cigarettes to people's homes. That lawsuit remains pending.

The case is State of New York, et al v. United Parcel Service, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 15-01136.

Latest comments

Maybe if these liberals wouldn't impose such a ridiculously high tax on cigarettes, that overwhelmingly hurt the poor and middle class, there wouldn't be a black market. Yep, they always preach and preach about how the top 1 percent rake in everything. Ha! The Dems are just as responsible as the GOP for that, maybe more! I'm convinced that you may as well close your eyes and just tap any button when voting is underway! It wouldn't make a bit of difference. 6 of 1, half a dozen of the other!
I guess when you can't raise taxes and you've inflated the money supply to the limit, the next thing is to shake down large companies for billions of dollars. Anyone else noticing US, UK, and European governments suing for ridiculous sums lately? . . Economic World Collapse is not far off people.
Why is it UPS's responsibility to determine the tax consequences of the products it ships for its clients? Seems to me the gov't should go after the senders and/or receivers (but maybe their pockets aren't deep enough).
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.