Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Goldman Sachs to settle U.S. rate-rigging lawsuit for $56.5 million

Published 12/16/2016, 11:49 PM
Updated 12/17/2016, 12:00 AM
© Reuters. A view of the Goldman Sachs stall on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange

© Reuters. A view of the Goldman Sachs stall on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange

By Nate Raymond

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc (N:GS) has agreed to pay $56.5 million to resolve a U.S. class action lawsuit accusing it and other banks of rigging an interest rate benchmark used in the $553 trillion derivatives market.

The proposed settlement was disclosed in papers filed in federal court in Manhattan on Friday. It came after seven other banks agreed in May to pay a combined $324 million to resolve the litigation.

As part of the deal, Goldman has also agreed to provide lawyers for the plaintiffs evidence including transaction data, documents and witness interviews, which could be used in litigations against the remaining banks, the court papers said.

Neither a spokesman for Goldman Sachs nor a lawyer for the plaintiffs immediately responded to a request for comment late on Friday.

The case is one of many pending in Manhattan federal court accusing banks of conspiring to rig rate benchmarks, securities prices or commodities prices.

In the lawsuit, several pension funds and municipalities accused 14 banks, including those that settled, of conspiring to rig the "ISDAfix" benchmark for their own gain from at least 2009 to 2012.

Companies and investors use ISDAfix to price swaps transactions, commercial real estate mortgages and structured debt securities.

The lawsuit accused the banks of executing rapid trades before the rate was set each day. It said the banks also caused UK brokerage ICAP Plc (F:IAP) to delay trades until they moved ISDAfix where they wanted, and post rates that did not reflect market activity.

U.S. and European regulators have also examined whether ISDAfix was set properly. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has secured settlements of $115 million with Barclays (LON:BARC) Plc in May 2015 and $250 million with Citigroup Inc (NYSE:C) in May 2016.

To date in the class action, seven other banks have settled, including JPMorgan Chase & Co (N:JPM), Bank of America Corp (N:BAC), Credit Suisse Group AG (S:CSGN) and Deutsche Bank AG (DE:DBKGn).

The remaining defendants are BNP Paribas SA (PA:BNPP), HSBC Holdings Plc (L:HSBA), Morgan Stanley (N:MS), Nomura Holdings Inc (T:8604), UBS AG (S:UBSG), Wells Fargo & Co (N:WFC) and ICAP, lawyers for the plaintiffs said.

© Reuters. A view of the Goldman Sachs stall on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange

The case is Alaska Electrical Pension Fund et al v. Bank of America Corp et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 14-07126.

Latest comments

It's amazing how the Big Banks can do whatever they want.. The litigation -- if at all -- goes on and on for aeons, & at the end of the day get away with such nonsensical fines.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.