Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Firms, lawyers say UK rule reform could do harm

Published 02/17/2011, 12:11 PM
Updated 02/17/2011, 12:16 PM

* Named firms could suffer "reputational hit" -lawyers

* New FCA approach "risky and penalises innovation"

By Huw Jones

LONDON, Feb 17 (Reuters) - The financial sector reacted angrily on Thursday over UK government plans to name firms being probed for misconduct before an investigation is completed, saying the practice could harm a company's image and livelihood.

The government published its revised reform of financial supervision, saying that making a decision to probe a company public would act as a deterrent.

The fear among banks and legal experts is that making a probe public is effectively a sanction in itself and may prompt a firm's clients to run for the exits.

"By pre-emptively informing a firm's clients of its investigation the new regulator could do serious damage to the firm's reputation and business," said Steven Francis, a partner at law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain.

"The Financial Services Authority regularly commences investigations that lead to no disciplinary outcome. The firm either satisfies the FSA there has been no wrong-doing; or the FSA simply gets it wrong," Francis said.

The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME), a banking lobby, also voiced its concerns.

"There is little to be gained and much damage to result from publicly associating a named firm with an allegation that might later prove unfounded," said Peter Beales, AFME's managing director for policy.

Regulators will need to be confident of their position when making pre-emptive announcements, said Arnondo Chakrabarti of Allen & Overy law firm.

"Those under scrutiny will take a hefty reputational hit before their case has been heard in any independent way," Chakrabarti said.

The government also announced the planned new Financial Conduct Authority, which replaces the FSA next year, will have powers to ban products, limit their distribution for up to a year and slap extra requirements on new products.

Traditionally, regulators have supervised how products are sold to consumers, stopping short of effective product approval.

"It appears to be a charter for regulators to micro-manage regulated institutions on a product-by-product basis," said Simon Gleeson, a partner at Clifford Chance.

"However since the regulator has neither the resources nor the ability to do this comprehensively across the entire industry, the practical outcome is unlikely to be too significant," Gleeson added.

Allen & Overy's Bob Penn said such a "shoot first, ask questions later approach" is risky and penalises innovation.

The planned rules would fundamentally change how financial services firms create and sell their products and make life more difficult, added David Kenmir of consultancy PwC. (Reporting by Huw Jones; Editing by Hans Peters)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.