Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

YouTube Influencers Face $1 Billion Lawsuit for FTX Promotion

Published 03/18/2023, 02:56 AM
Updated 03/18/2023, 03:00 AM
YouTube Influencers Face $1 Billion Lawsuit for FTX Promotion

YouTube Influencers Face $1 Billion Lawsuit for FTX Promotion

  • Plaintiff Edwin Garrison is claiming $1 billion in damages in a lawsuit against YouTube Influencers.
  • Garrison claims the influencers actively marketed FTX without disclosing the nature of their paid endorsements to their followers.
  • Meet Kevin, BitBoy Crypto, and LegalEagle voiced their opinions on the matter.

On March 15, Plaintiff Edwin Garrison filed a class action lawsuit claiming $1 billion in damages against YouTube Influencers who promoted FTX. The lawsuit seeks to hold influencers liable for FTX investors’ losses. Accordingly, outsider experts and some defendants voiced their opinions.

According to the court document, the class action complaint claims that YouTube influencers should be held accountable for promoting FTX. In detail, the plaintiff claims that the YouTubers provided financial advice and actively marketed FTX to their millions of followers without revealing the nature of their sponsorship and/or endorsement relationships to their audience.

Though FTX paid Defendants handsomely to push its brand and encourage their followers to invest, Defendants did not disclose the nature and scope of their sponsorships and/or endorsement deals, payments and compensation, nor conduct adequate (if any) due diligence.

The Defendants of the lawsuit are the mentioned YouTube Influencers. These include Kevin Paffrath, Graham Stephan, Andrei Jikh, Jaspreet Singh, Brian Jung, Jeremy Lefebvre, Tom Nash, Ben Armstrong, Erika Kullberg, and Creators Agency, LLC.

In response to the lawsuit, Kevin Paffrath (Meet Kevin) spoke with Internet Detective Coffeezilla. Paffrath denied the allegations that he was responsible for any losses from FTX. Furthermore, he mused that he was considering paying back some of the money, but only as a “charity.”

Speaking to other sources, Paffrath also said that the allegation of the non-disclosure of sponsorships/endorsements was false. Paffrath stated that he regularly discloses his sponsored videos, and all of his FTX videos have disclaimers stating they are.

Ben Armstrong (BitBoy Crypto), another one of the defendants, mocked the lawsuit on Twitter and threatened a countersuit. Armstrong claimed that he never had paid FTX sponsorships and had no connections or deals with the company.

Notably, famous YouTuber Lawyer LegalEagle pointed out that the lawsuit was a “copy and paste job” of a previous FTX-related claim. LegalEagle notes that the YouTube Influencer Lawsuit and another Influencer Lawsuit involving celebrities such as Tom Brady have the same lawyers, plaintiffs, and claims.

Meanwhile, most netizens seem to be out for blood. Many tweets quoting the lawsuit seek to find crypto influencers accountable for the FTX losses.

The post YouTube Influencers Face $1 Billion Lawsuit for FTX Promotion appeared first on Coin Edition.

See original on CoinEdition

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.