We have updated our privacy policy and terms & conditions. Find out more here.
9
 

What Are The Koch Brothers Up To In Alberta's Oil Sands?

By Stock MarketsApr 10, 2014 05:54AM GMT 2 Comments
 
AA
+
-

There's been a tempest of internet chatter over the recent Washington Post story which claimed the Koch brothers are now the largest oil sands leaseholders in the province of Alberta, even ahead of supermajors Royal Dutch Shell B (RDSb) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP). The Koch subsidiary is reported to hold at least 1.1 million acres, an area almost the size of Delaware.
 
Because of the Koch's political ties, the story is of interest to those who have tried to link the Koch brothers to the proposed XL Pipeline through which a portion of Alberta's bitumen is likely to flow, although the Koch brothers insist no such connection exists. Therefore the newspaper's story is of great interest to the political pundits, but relatively few are talking about the bigger question, namely --- Why do the Koch brothers have such a huge footprint in Alberta's oil sands in the first place?
 
The question is of immediate interest to investors, because Koch Industries is a $115 billion outfit and one of America's most powerful corporations. If the Koch brothers are as involved in Alberta's oil sands as the Washington Post reports, then investors should want to know why.
 
According to the article, the Koch holdings are primarily concentrated in the Peace River region of Alberta --- a lesser-known oil sands area compared to the much higher-profile Athabasca region where all the major surface operations are based. Unlike the enormous bitumen-mining operations in Fort McMurray which are relatively simple to excavate, the Peace River oil sands deposits are located underground, several hundred meters below the surface. They are known as in-situ deposits because they are deeply-buried sand formations saturated with extra-heavy oil. Up until a few short years ago, these deposits were mostly shunned by the major producers. But as technology improved and oil prices rose, all that began to change.
 
Since Koch Industries is a private corporation, they are under no obligation to give details on their massive oil sands lease-blocks in the Peace River area. In fact, their website provides almost no information on the subject. Therefore in order to find out more about their holdings, I turned to the other oil companies in Peace River and began going through their websites. What I discovered was interesting.
 
It turns out a large portion of Koch's Peace River oil sands holdings are concentrated in a single area comprising about 800 square miles. Their lease-block in this area covers nearly a dozen townships. That's a massive land position, by anyone's standards. But why is Koch there? It turns out that Koch has surrounded an exploration company which has discovered a significant deposit --- an underground geological platform which is saturated with 3.4 billion barrels of extra-heavy oil of which 887 million barrels are recoverable, according to the company's 51-101 compliant report. The company is Strata Oil and this is the map they've released on their website. As you can see, Koch has surrounded them to the northeast.
 
It turns out that Koch isn't the only major player that's taken an interest in the region. Shell is directly to the south, as is Husky Energy. Both these companies have assembled substantial lease-blocks in the adjacent townships.
 
As I began to look more deeply into the play, the multi-zone potential of the region became evident to me. While neither Shell, Koch, nor Husky are revealing the full extent of their plans, there appear to be three major oil zones which are being targeted in the area. They are all enormous.
 
First, there's the underground oil sands formation which contains a very thick, extra-heavy type of oil which only flows when heat is applied to it. Shell was the first one to really hone-in on this prize, and is now ramping up to 80,000 barrels per day at their nearby Carmon Creek project.
 
Second, there's the slightly deeper carbonate-based formations, which, like the sands, contain extra-heavy oil requiring thermal treatment. Shell has shown great interest in exploiting carbonate-hosted bitumen deposits in Alberta, paying $465 million for their initial carbonate lease-blocks in the Grosmont platform to the east. In fact, Alberta's carbonate-hosted bitumen is considered by many to be "the next oil sands" and has been estimated by the provincial government to contain 447 billion barrels of crude, of which 89 billion barrels may be recoverable using SAGD or CSS technology.
 
And third, there are what appear to be a number of highly-valuable pools of heavy oil which flow without thermal treatment. The wells are essentially conventional --- they are cold-flow, primary production. NYSE-listed Baytex Energy has moved aggressively into the region and is exploiting these pools with incredible success. In fact, they've acquired more than 300 sections of oil sands leases and have so far drilled 183 cold-production horizontal wells with a mindblowing 100% success rate, according to their website. They are producing from an average pay-thickness of 15-20 meters. It's so lucrative that Baytex has announced they will allocate a larger percentage of their 2014 budget to the Peace River area than any of their other operations, including their shale oil projects in the Bakken --- reinforcing my view that Alberta’s oil sands deposits may trump their shale oil counterparts just on the basis of economics alone.
 
It's therefore little wonder that Koch has moved so heavily into the Peace River oil sands play. They've astutely assembled an incredible land position in one of North America's most valuable oil-producing regions. Between the thermal in-situ oil sands deposits, the substantial cold-flow bitumen pools, and the promising carbonate bitumen reservoir, Koch may be sitting on a multi-billion barrel oil sands portfolio which keeps the company rolling in profits for decades to come.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data .

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Add a Comment

 

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Conoco Phillips
 
 
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Comments
Don Carruthers
Don Carruthers Apr 11, 2014 03:25PM GMT
First paragraph sets a tone of misleadingly presented 'facts'. I really don't care that the Koch guys are speculating in Alberta's Oil Sands, but the region is so vast (about the size of Florida) that the K's holdings are only about 3% and 70% of area is leased out. So no, they aren't a major player/holder relative to others and neither are the other International companies you listed in a irrelevant comparison. The KXL pipeline is for companies producing NOW and all the capacity is pre sold, if Koch went ahead and tried to produce, it'd take 10-15 years and it's anyones guess if their oil would ever get into KXL at that time. This whole article is moot.

Larry Stevens
Larry Stevens Apr 10, 2014 06:30PM GMT
This is so spinny. It repeats the challenged and then retracted Post claims but doesn't mention the errors or the retraction. Then it talks about "surrounds to the north", which...huh?
 
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
 
 

Successfully Reported

Thank you. This comment has been flagged for a moderator.
_touchLoadingMsg