Please try another search
Many investors are pointing to low interest rates today as a way to justify soaring equity valuations. Certainly, investors have felt the need to go out on the risk curve to generate greater return when the lowest risk investments offer none.
However, the fact that investors have done this, and to an incredible degree already, does not make it a valid investment thesis.
In fact, it’s just the opposite. I feel like a broken record referring time and time again to Cliff Asness’ paper, “Fight The Fed Model,” but it seems there are still a lot of folks, and many professionals even, who haven’t yet read it.
One of the points Cliff makes in debunking the idea that low interest rates should justify high S&P 500 valuations is that earnings growth is very highly correlated to interest rates and inflation. When the latter two are low, earnings growth is low, as well. This is important because in order for low interest rates to actually justify higher valuations then this relationship must not hold.
In other words, those who would like to reduce the discount rate in valuing future cash flows must also reduce the growth rate of those earnings. Not doing so is, at best, historically very naive and, at worst, intellectually dishonest.
Right now this is an even bigger deal than ever before simply because rates are so extremely low and valuations so extremely high. If using the Fed Model during “normal” times is a problem, then to assume that interest rates will remain as low as they are today and that earnings growth will be anywhere near historical averages over the next decade is exponentially more troublesome.
Relying on the Fed Model is essentially betting that the relationship between earnings growth and inflation will not hold going forward, despite over a century of evidence to the contrary. Either that, or you’re just relying on TINA (“There Is No Alternative” – to owning stocks) to prove the “greater fool theory.” And to me, those both sound like very dangerous propositions for long-term investors.
If you had been following the S&P 500 closely this past week, it likely would have left you scratching your head if you were trying to align the news with the market action. For...
The Russell 2000 (IWM) has been defending its 50-day MA over the early part of 2024, but the last few days have seen a shift in this support with 'sell' triggers in the MACD and...
Consumer instinct is a wonderful attribute to have and is generally talked about when considering stocks to buy.What Is the “Consumer Instinct”? “Peter Lynch is one of the most...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.