Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

S&P 500 Earnings: Ex-Energy, Numbers Remain Strong

Published 02/07/2015, 11:32 PM

The equity market bears have now recently become S&P 500 earnings bears, and to be frank, at least in terms of Q4 ’14 data, S&P 500 earnings are very strong, in my opinion.

By the numbers: (per Thomson Reuters as of 2/6/15’s This Week in Earnings):

  • The forward 4-quarter estimate fell to $120.94 from last week’s $121.99, or roughly $1.05 per share.
  • The P/E ratio on the forward estimate is 17.0(x) the forward estimate.
  • The PEG ratio is now a whopping 8.43(x), which makes sense if we look at the y/y growth rate (below)
  • The earnings yield on the S&P 500 is back below 6% to 5.88%.
  • The year-over-year (y/y) growth rate on the forward estimate is now just 2.02%.

In 2012, the y/y growth rate of the forward estimate fell to almost 0% by the end of September ’12, while full-year 2012 earnings growth (including Financial sector write-downs) was roughly 6%, and the S&P 500 had a total return that year of 12%.

What is my point ? To be frank it is difficult to tell when earnings estimates are “meandering” as they sometimes do, or when there is a real “trend” in place.

In early 2015, there is no question, there is significant downward pressure on Energy sector estimates, without any real increase in other sectors, except Consumer Discretionary this past week.

Between this week and last week, for Q4 ’14, and presumably due to General Motors (NYSE:GM), Consumer Discretionary earnings jumped from 8% last week to +12.7 this week. (Long GM)

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Here is the change in Q4 ’14 earnings growth estimates by sector: (first column as of 2/26/15, 2nd column as of Jan 1 ’15, 3rd column as of Oct 1 ’14)

Ranked from strongest to weakest growth:

  • Health Care: +22.5%, +17.6%, +19.4%
  • Technology: +17.3%, +8.9%, +10.5% Apple’s high quarter helped, long AAPL
  • Cons. Discretionary: +12.7%, +8%, +13.9%
  • Industrials: +11.9%, +9.9%, +12.4% (surprised given strong dollar; I like this sector too)
  • Telecom: +8.5%, +13.8%, +23.8%
  • Utilities: +7%, +11.2%, +7.7%
  • Basic Materials: +4.1%, -2%, +10.0%
  • Consumer Staples: -0.6%, 0%, +4.5%
  • Financials: -1.6%, +1.4%, +10%
  • Energy: -21.2%, -19.8%, +6.6%
  • S&P 500: +6.4%, +4.2%, +11.2%

To this missive short and to the point, assuming that the Energy sector is 10% of the S&P 500 by both earnings weight and market cap (approximately), here is the percentage drag the Energy sector represents for quarters Q4 ’14 through Q4 ’15, and if added back to the S&P 500 expected earnings growth rate, what that growth rate would be without Energy’s drag:

  • Q4 ’14: -2%, +8.4%
  • Q1 ’15: -6.2%, +4.8%
  • Q2 ’15: -6.1%, +6.8%
  • Q3 ’15: -5.4%, +8.8%
  • Q4 ’15: -3.2%, +10.4%

Analysis / commentary: My own opinion is that S&P 500 earnings are fine, ex-Energy and might even improve gradually though 2015. Last week, with Macy's (NYSE:M) and Kohl's (NYSE:KSS) comp data, we could have seen the start of the consumer benefit from lower gas prices. Macy’s could be more of an expense-driven guide higher, while Kohl’s was clearly a better comp. Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) will be the real tell for gasoline savings given their demographic. (Long WMT)

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Fundamentalis sounds like a broken record but the Energy sector is distorting the S&P 500 earnings estimates, and while the drag of the Energy sector on the numbers is clearly visible, the benefit from lower crude oil, gasoline and natural gas prices is not quantifiable.

Whatever the issues with this market and the spate of recent volatility, my opinion is that we are NOT on the cusp of the S&P 500 in an “earnings recession” or earnings rolling over.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.