Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Real Traders vs. The Algos

Published 04/01/2014, 11:15 AM
Updated 05/14/2017, 06:45 AM

After watching “60 Minutes” Sunday night and reading Tim Worstall’s story in Forbes, “Michael Lewis Is Entirely Wrong About High Frequency Trading Hitting The Little Guy,” I am 100% sure that there is more denial than facts coming out of the Forbes story. Let’s face it, algorithmic trading is not good for the smaller traders and anyone who says it is has no idea what they are talking about.

Below are a few quotes from “60 Minutes,” along with our comments. I don’t know if Tim Worstall has ever traded a futures contract, but I’ll put my 37 years on the floor and creating one of the world’s largest S&P 500 index operations against his opinions.

60 Minutes:

“Robots aren’t just taking your jobs, they’re stealing your profits on stock trades, too.

MrTopStep.com: Yes, the robots are stealing our money and have been for years. That is nothing new, Tim.

The stock market has been rigged by a group of tech-savvy insiders who are using super-computers to game trades at the expense of normal investors, journalist Michael Lewis charges in his new book, “Flash Boys.”

MrTopStep.com: Tim, stocks were rigged first and after the algo boys overran the stock market they moved to the futures. The practice not only steals money but there is no doubt that the practice causes moves that would never occur otherwise.

I have been in the S&Ps since 1985 and did the UBS program trading business in the S&P 500. I have been part of every major stock market move since the ’87 crash and no one can tell me that the practice of algorithmic trading doesn’t disturb the overall price action of the markets. Nor can anyone tell me that algorithmic trading wasn’t the cause of the flash crash and thousands of other aberrations that help the retail trade lose and the machines make money.

The robots’ high-speed networks allow them to buy the stocks milliseconds in advance — enough time to push up the price for the investor that had made the original order.

MrTopStep.com: Yes.

“They’re able to identify your desire to, to buy shares in Microsoft and buy them in front of you and sell them back to you at a higher price,” Lewis said. “The speed advantage that the faster traders have is milliseconds … fractions of milliseconds.”

MrTopStep: Yes. We’ve seen it happen day after day. Tim, you go on to say, “And while I’ve not got the detailed numbers to prove it, I’d be willing to bet a very large sum indeed that” the net activity of HFT benefits small traders. Well, you haven’t got the numbers and you haven’t bet a large sum. So why didn’t you ask someone who has? I’d be happy to give you a list of names.

The villains are a “combination of these stock exchanges, the big Wall Street banks and high-frequency traders” who are bagging billions every year with the practice, Lewis said in an interview Sunday with “60 Minutes.”

The victims, Lewis adds, are “everybody who has an investment in the stock market.”

MrTopStep.com: Tim, no swipe at you, but after handling the S&P 500 futures business of some of the largest investment firms in the world and doing all the program trading I did years ago and watching the program trading volume make up over 70% of the daily volume, I place very little credence in your story. The next time Forbes wants to do a story on algorithmic trading but doesn’t have “numbers to prove it” or a solid connection to reality, have them email me: danny@mrtopstep.com.

Volume matters

Volume has always been a key element of trading, and that is why the algo traders have moved from stocks to futures where there is more robust buying and selling going on. It’s not that the algos don’t play stocks anymore; it’s just overloaded. Where the algo used to try and make a penny or a half penny it’s now down to trying to make one-tenth of a penny.

As more programs flooded the stock markets the “vig” disappeared. In order to stay in the game, algorithmic trading moved to the futures market and now it’s moving to the options markets.

Volume matters in this case, but not to the retail investor who constantly gets knocked out of a position by an algorithmic program that chases buy and sell stops. This volume could be taken away but the exchanges have forgotten about who the real customers have been. The real customers are those seeking to accurately value companies and commodities, not just wring billions of tenths of pennies out of meaningless volatility.

Original Post

Latest comments

"Let’s face it, algorithmic trading is not good for the smaller traders and anyone who says it is has no idea what they are talking about.". . Hmm. In the last 30 years the bid as spread has come down from 0.2% to 0.002% on stocks. This is largely the result of the liquidity brought by HFT. It's the flip side of there only being one tenth of a penny of vig left as you mention.. . Are you really trying to say that this compression of the spread doesn't benefit every investor, small or large?
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.