Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Commodity Pair Trade: Long GBP/USD, Short Natural Gas

Published 03/31/2015, 02:59 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

For some time, the natural gas price has significantly underperformed the pound sterling against the US dollar. The result has been a decreasing price of the commodity pair: long natural gas, short GBP/USD. The graph below shows the performance of a pair ratio of 10 Mmbtu natural gas (long) to GBP 10,000 (short).

Natural Gas:GBP/USD Pair: Recent Changes

Both have been declining in US dollar price; the decrease in the price of the pair has reflected steeper falls in the price of natural gas.

Over the last week, the natural gas price fell 1.9% (to $2.64) whilst GBP/USD declined 0.9% (to $1.4812) to give a 0.9% decrease in the price of the pair. This was accompanied by a 10.6% fall in its fair value, largely driven by movements in stock markets and commodity prices. The table below analyzes the move:

Natural Gas:GBP/USD Pair Last Week

An excess of fair value decrease over price decrease would normally be a signal to sell or go short the pair (ie. to short natural gas, buy GBP/USD). Following this signal over the last 90 days would have provided an annualized gain (on gross – long plus short - exposure) of 57.0% with volatility of 17.7%.

We have also applied this methodology to a number of other pairs of related securities – EURUSD/gold, gold/GBPUSD, DAX/S&P 500, palladium/copper, ASX 200/FTSE, CAC 40/Nikkei and oil/EURUSD. The portfolio of all these pairs traded using the disparity between price and fair value change (as above) has returned an annualized 35.4% with volatility of 4.8% over the 90 day backtest period.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

We find a fair value of the natural gas/GBPUSD pair above the current price, suggesting that the pair is undervalued and providing the opposite signal to that analyzed above. Trading the pair using this indicator over the 90 day backtest period showed a 10% annualized return with volatility of 18%. For the portfolio of pairs described above, the annualized return was breakeven. Hence we note the signal, but tend to discount it in favor of the stronger performing price/fair value change disparity indicator.

Risk considerations

The graph below shows the sensitivity of the pair’s fair value to its drivers:

Nat Gas:GBP/USD Elasticity to Drivers

As can be seen, the natural gas/GBPUSD pair is highly positively correlated to the US dollar, not surprising given the positive relationship between USD and the natural gas price and therefore both positions in the pair. Our fair value indicators suggest some short term upside in the US dollar index which would pose a risk to the pair trade (long GBPUSD, short natural gas) recommended above.

The USD may undergo some volatility later this week if the jobs data reads come in some distance from consensus. Given the sensitivity of the pair to the USD evident in the above graph, this could translate into volatility in GBPUSD and the natural gas price. GBP could be impacted by the Q4 UK GDP print today (Tuesday).

The historical volatility of the pair over the last 90 days, at 18%, is well below the volatility for natural gas (69%) although above GBPUSD volatility (9%).The pair trade can be thought of as a low risk way of taking on exposure to natural gas.Using our price/fair value movement indicator as underpins this article, the return/volatility ratio from trading the natural gas/GBPUSD pair, at 3.2 times, compares favourably to that for trading outright natural gas (2.8 times).

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Held in combination with a US equity portfolio, lower volatility and higher return may be achieved. A portfolio of 5% allocated to the pair (traded as recommended in this article) and 95% allocated to the S&P 500 index had a volatility of 12.6% over the last 90 days vs 13.2% for 100% in the S&P 500. The annualized returns were -1.2% (5% allocated to pair) vs -4.5% (100% S&P 500).

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.