We have updated our privacy policy and terms & conditions. Find out more here.

Canada: Labour Market Likely Not As Strong As LFS Suggests

By Market OverviewJan 31, 2013 10:43AM GMT
Canada: Labour Market Likely Not As Strong As LFS Suggests
By   |  Jan 31, 2013 10:43AM GMT
Canada's Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours (SEPH) which polls establishments and lags the more closely watched Labour Force Survey by roughly two months, showed that Canada gained just 3,100 jobs in November. That came after large job losses in the prior two months, taking the net jobs tally over the September- November period to -48,000. That contrasts sharply with the 89,000 increase in paid jobs in the LFS over the same three-month period. Clearly, the SEPH seems to be more in tune than the LFS with the stagnant economy — GDP growth likely averaged below 1% annualized in the second half of 2012. As today’s Hot Chart shows, over the July to November period, only 31,000 jobs were created according to the SEPH, which is about a quarter of the tally reported by the LFS over the same period for the paid component. The SEPH paints a less rosy picture than the LFS particularly in sectors like manufacturing and education, which both showed atypically strong employment in the LFS last year compared to the historic average. All told, the data this morning reinforce our view that Canadian employment wasn't as strong in the second half of 2012 as the LFS suggested. So we expect the LFS to reverse course and start producing negative numbers sooner rather than later — we’re calling for an employment drop of 30K in January's LFS to be released on February 8th.

Labour market likely not as strong as LFS suggests
Labour market likely not as strong as LFS suggests
Canada: Labour Market Likely Not As Strong As LFS Suggests

Related Articles

Canada: Labour Market Likely Not As Strong As LFS Suggests

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Add Chart to Comment
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?

Successfully Reported

Thank you. This comment has been flagged for a moderator.
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data .

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.