Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

A Look At Equity Style Boxes

Published 01/02/2015, 12:43 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

Weekly S&P 500 earnings data will come out today, January 2nd, 2015, from Thomson Reuters and Factset. Examining the charts yesterday, the first day of 2015, I happened to look at some of the “growth” and “value” ETF’s.

Morningstar has two ETF’s that divide the large-cap universe:

(NYSE:JKE)– iShares Morningstar Large Growth Index ETF

(NYSE:JKF) – iShares Morningstar Large Value Index ETF

What surprised me was the annual return difference between the two: Growth was up +13.9% for 2014, while Value was up 7% – 7.5% per Morningstar’s own performance calculator, and that was calculating the return from 12/31/2013 through 12/31/2014.

This probably isn’t a big surprise since readers can probably guess that Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) was Growth’s largest holding at 11%, while Exxon (NYSE:XOM)) was Value’s largest weighting at 7.77%. Still the performance difference seemed sizable enough to warrant the note.

I guess just looking at 2014’s annual return between the S&P 500 – roughly 13.5% – and the Russell 2000 – about 4.8% gets us to the same result, so perhaps this isn’t that revelatory.

Only in the Mid-Cap range did Value outperform Growth: TheiShares Russell Midcap Value returned 12.75%, while the iShares Russell Midcap Growth returned 10.9% (2014 returns were checked against two different sources.) Even though Sempra Energy was the largest name in the Russell MidCap Value ETF its weighting was just 0.87% and the other top 10 names were tech, utilities, and financial-related. In the smallcap style box, Growth was up about 5%, versus Value’s 2%.

Analysis / commentary: For clients, I have always primarily fished in the large-cap universe, and even today with the S&P 500 considered fairly valued at 16(x) – 17(x) forward earnings for an expected 7% – 8% growth rate for 2015, I still think the value in the market remains with the late 1990’s tech leaders, the Nasdaq 100, QQQ and the S&P 100. That isn’t just the cheapest part of the market, but it is also the part of the market with the best cash-flow valuations and the best return-of-capital (dividends and share repo’s) policies.

The 1990’s bull market was led by Technology and Financials. The 2000 to 2009 leadership was gold, commodity and energy based, while the worst sectors last decade were Financials and Technology. The tide is turning back to the old leadership.

It is the old growth leaders of the 1990’s, and some of the new youngbloods that offer the best risk-reward should we see that inevitable 20% correction at some point.

In the period from 1/1/2000 through 12/31/2009, the Growth leaders of the 1990’s became the value stocks of that decade, and since 1/1/2010.

The Financial’s are my top sector pick for 2015, but there are likely to be overweights in Technology, Industrials, and Retail (Staples / Discretionary).

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.